by Andrés Peregalli
Tell me how you evaluate and I will tell you what kind of education you promote
The complex world that we inhabit values measurements and their virtues, often to an excessive degree. We thus live with the constant pressure to capture and make sense of learning that is taking place among individuals, groups and institutions.
Within such a context, the evidence that results from an evaluation instrument will be used as a proxy. In the best-case scenario, it is a solid and robust proxy. I once heard it said that evaluation in a university setting involves one person who is terrified (the student) and another who is bored (the lecturer). While all images are unfair to a point, this characterisation (still very common) is useful for identifying concepts/representations that allude to ways of understanding education, learning, teaching, evaluation and participation, and the effects they have on those who experience them. To put it another way: tell me how (what, why, when, who, where…) you evaluate and I will tell you what kind of education you promote.
This post describes a participatory evaluation experience in an undergraduate university setting. More specifically, it describes a Theoretical-Practical Seminar (TPS) within the department of Philosophy and Theology at the Catholic University of Argentina (UCA) that has been running for 10 years and is based on the Service-Learning (SL) pedagogy. The experience exemplifies a more profound epistemological and evaluative approach and another way of understanding teaching and learning. These political-pedagogical and didactic foundations are consistent with the educational model we are striving to pursue: a process of humanisation centred around the people who teach and learn. In this approach, there is no room for terror or boredom. Rather, the focus is on agency so that learning can flourish, be enjoyed and celebrated.
Continue reading →